OLSEN v. BREEZE, INC.

Docket Nos. C020585, C021766.

48 Cal.App.4th 608 (1996)

PHILIP A. OLSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BREEZE, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 31, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Philip A. Olsen, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, William A. Kershaw, Robin Leslie Stewart, Michael D. Rust, James T. Wiezel, McKinley & Smith, William C. McKinley, Timothy M. Smith and Evan Eickmeyer for Defendants and Respondents.

Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, Paul Rosenlund and David A. Greene for Defendants and Respondents and as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendents and Respondents.


OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

This appeal concerns the legality of a release from liability required as a condition for purchasing, renting, or obtaining service on ski bindings. For reasons hereafter discussed, we shall conclude the use of such releases in the ski industry does not violate either state unfair competition laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) or the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases