1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 549 N.W.2d
  5. 549 N.W.2d 106 (1996)
 

KRONING v. STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO.

No. CX-95-2097.

549 N.W.2d 106 (1996)

Ronald W. KRONING, et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted August 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Heuel, Rochester, for Appellants.

Lee L. LaBore, Hopkins, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., TOUSSAINT, C.J., and CRIPPEN, J.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

In an action against respondent State Farm Insurance for uninsured motorist benefits, appellant Ronald Kroning and his wife, appellant Theogene Kroning, challenge the denial of a new trial on numerous grounds but most pointedly on (a) the trial court's permission for use of collateral sources as evidence and (b) the trial court's suggestion to the jury that this evidence may have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases