MAUZY v. KELLY SERVICES, INC.

No. 95-301.

75 Ohio St.3d 578 (1996)

MAUZY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KELLY SERVICES, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., Patrick J. Perotti and Robert J. Hoffman, for appellants.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Michael J. Frantz and Daniel A. Ward, for appellees.

Louis A. Jacobs; Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman and Frederick M. Gittes, urging reversal for amici curiae, Ohio Employment Lawyers Association, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, National Conference of Black Lawyers, Columbus Chapter, Mid Ohio Board for an Independent Living Environment, Ada-Ohio, and Police Officers for Equal Rights.

Cathy Ventrell-Monsees, urging reversal for amicus curiae, American Association of Retired Persons.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and David A. Westrup, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Chamber of Commerce.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

There are two issues presented for our determination —one involving the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees on Mauzy's claim of unlawful age discrimination under former R.C. 4101.17, and the other involving the denial of two requests by Mauzy for additional discovery. The facts pertaining to the second issue will be set forth infra. We proceed first to the issue of summary judgment because this issue can be resolved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases