1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 549 N.W.2d
  5. 549 N.W.2d 102 (1996)
 

STATE v. BALMA

No. C9-96-304.

549 N.W.2d 102 (1996)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Michael Andrew BALMA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, St. Paul, Paul T. Ostrow, Sweeney, Borer & Ostrow, St. Paul, for respondent.

Daniel Jon Smith, Meshbesher Law Office, Minnetonka, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and RANDALL and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Michael Andrew Balma argues that the trial court abused discretion by (1) denying his request for court-appointed counsel during a probation revocation hearing and (2) revoking his probation. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

FACTS

On June 15, 1995, Balma pled guilty to fifth-degree assault. He was placed on two years probation with 90 days stayed. The court also ordered Balma to (1) complete...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases