The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in restoring the case to the trial calendar, since the requirements of 22 NYCRR 202.21 (f) were satisfied. Defendant's contention that plaintiff made a "deliberate and knowing misrepresentation" to the court is unsubstantiated. Finally, we note that the IAS Court, in its prior order, dated January 6, 1995, clearly gave plaintiff the option of moving once again to restore this case to
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
STOCK SHOP, INC. v. NEW YORK TIMES CO.
223 A.D.2d 426 (1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 39
Stock Shop, Inc., Respondent, v. New York Times Company, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 18, 1996
January 18, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
