1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 204 Wis.2d
  5. 204 Wis.2d 445 (1996)
 

STATE v. BRATRUD

No. 95-3402-CR.

204 Wis.2d 445 (1996)

555 N.W.2d 663

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald A. BRATRUD, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided September 12, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael J. Devanie of Michael J. Devanie Law Office of La Crosse.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and David J. Becker, assistant attorney general.

Before Eich, C.J., Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ.

ROGGENSACK, J.

Donald Bratrud appeals a battery conviction, after a guilty plea, on the ground that Wisconsin lacked subject matter jurisdiction because there was conflicting evidence in the record about where the crime was committed. However, we conclude that the amended information pleaded facts sufficient to support subject matter jurisdiction, and when Bratrud entered his guilty plea, the admitted those facts. Therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases