The challenged questions that the prosecutor posed to defendant on cross-examination were proper. The court exercised its discretion appropriately in allowing them. The prosecutor "adequately demonstrated [her] good faith and possessed a sufficient basis for asking the challenged question[s]" (People v Kass,
The objected-to portions of the prosecutor's summation were fair comment on the evidence and responsive...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.