We granted review in this matter to clarify, following our decisions in Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.GET STARTED
OR
Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to
continue
LAZAR v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. S044234.
12 Cal.4th 631 (1996)
909 P.2d 981
49 Cal. Rptr.2d 377
ANDREW LAZAR, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RYKOFF-SEXTON, INC., Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 29, 1996.
January 29, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ross & Morrison, Gary B. Ross, Andrew D. Morrison, Schulman & Miller, Barry A. Schulman and Jerry Miller for Petitioner.
William G. Hoerger, Luis Jaramillo, Joseph Posner, Quackenbush & Quackenbush and William C. Quackenbush as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Martin C. Washton and Jeffrey F. Webb for Real Party in Interest.
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Richard J. Simmons, Michael G. Morgan, Morrison & Foerster, Kirby Wilcox and James E. Boddy, Jr., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
