1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio St.3d 563 (1996)
 

STATE EX REL. HESTER v. CRUSH

No. 95-2470.

75 Ohio St.3d 563 (1996)

THE STATE EX REL. HESTER, APPELLANT, v. CRUSH, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Hester, pro se.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The General Assembly has said that "[t]he writ of mandamus must not be issued when there is plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." R.C. 2731.05. We also have emphasized that mandamus is not available when the relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Casey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 429

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases