1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio St.3d 558 (1996)
 

STATE v. THOMPKINS

No. 95-450.

75 Ohio St.3d 558 (1996)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. THOMPKINS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Lynn G. Koeller, Montgomery County Public Defender, Anthony R. Cicero and Charles L. Grove, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellants.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Jeffrey S. Sutton, State Solicitor, and Simon B. Karas, Deputy Chief Counsel, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, state of Ohio.

FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

At issue is the validity of R. C. 2925.03(M), 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.23(H),1 which mandate driver's license suspensions upon conviction for drug offenses. Each appellant in this consolidated appeal was subject to one of the three cited statutes. The appellants challenge the constitutionality of these statutes on due process and equal protection grounds.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases