1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 231 A.D.2d
  5. 231 A.D.2d 402 (1996)
 

ROSTUCA HOLDINGS, LTD. v. POLO

231 A.D.2d 402 (1996)

646 N.Y.S.2d 812

Rostuca Holdings, Ltd., Appellant, v. Rosa S. Polo, Also Known as Rosa F. Polo and Rosa Franco, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 5, 1996

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant premised upon allegations that she was an aider and abettor of a fraudulent investment scheme perpetrated by her former husband. The timeliness of the action is at issue on appeal. The applicable Statute of Limitations (CPLR 203 [g]; 213 [8]) requires that an action for fraud be commenced within six years from the commission of the wrongful act, or within two years from the time the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases