1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 50 Cal.App.4th
  5. 50 Cal.App.4th 580 (1996)
 

ARMSTRONG v. OPTICAL RADIATION CORP.

Docket No. B089213.

50 Cal.App.4th 580 (1996)

WINIFRED ARMSTRONG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. OPTICAL RADIATION CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charlotte E. Costan, Kaplan Law Corporation and Thomas D. Peterson-More for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kolts & Nawa and Kathlene Landgraf Kolts for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

MASTERSON, J.

In July 1991, plaintiff Winifred Armstrong underwent cataract surgery. Defendant Optical Radiation Corporation (ORC) manufactured a product used during the surgery. In July 1992, Armstrong filed suit against ORC, alleging that its product had caused severe damage to her eye. She asserted causes of action for negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty. ORC moved for summary judgment on the ground that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases