Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as untimely inasmuch as the action was not commenced within the applicable Statute of Limitations. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the limitations period was not tolled by either the 30-day waiting period found in General Municipal Law § 50-i (1) (b) or the period for an examination of claim found in General Municipal Law § 50-h (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.