1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 287 N.J.
  5. 287 N.J. Super. 337 (1996)
 

HEINL v. HEINL

287 N.J. Super. 337 (1996)

671 A.2d 147

LENA HEINL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES HOWARD HEINL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph J. Pocaro argued the cause for appellant (Pocaro & Pocaro, attorneys; Mr. Pocaro, on the brief).

Robert W. Becker argued the cause for respondent (Reed and Scholl, attorneys; Donald F. Scholl, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Scholl and Mr. Becker, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, KLEINER and HUMPHREYS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D.

Defendant James Heinl appeals numerous provisions of a final judgment of divorce, including alimony, child support, attorney's fees, and equitable distribution. Although several of the issues raised by defendant in this appeal are without merit, we find that there were errors in the court's decisions respecting alimony, counsel fees, and equitable distribution. In our partial reversal, we are called upon to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases