STATE v. LOPEZ

No. 95-3250-CR.

207 Wis.2d 413 (1996)

559 N.W.2d 264

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Agustin LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 11, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Gill M. Semancik of Law Office of Brendan J. Rowen of Wauwatosa.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general and Thomas J. Balistreri, assistant attorney general.

Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ.


ANDERSON, P.J.

Agustin Lopez appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the search warrant of his home was not supported by probable cause, and thus, the evidence seized was found as part of an illegal search and was inadmissible. Lopez further argues that § 161.49, STATS.,1 the penalty enhancer, is void for vagueness. In the alternative, he maintains that the State violated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases