1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 76 Ohio
  5. 76 Ohio St.3d 540 (1996)
 

STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI POST v. CITY OF CINCINNATI

No. 95-1803.

76 Ohio St.3d 540 (1996)

THE STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI POST v. CITY OF CINCINNATI.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baker & Hostetler, David L. Marburger, Hilary W. Rule, Jeffrey T. Williams and Bruce W. Sanford, for relator.

Fay D. Dupuis, City Solicitor, and Karl P. Kadon III, Deputy City Solicitor, for respondent.

PFEIFER, J.

We hold that the Cincinnati City Council's back-to-back meetings, which, taken together, were attended by a majority of council members, violated the provisions of R.C. 121.22, that the dictates of R.C. 121.22 are applicable to Cincinnati City Council, and that the Cincinnati Post is entitled to its requested relief.

Ohio's "Sunshine Law," R.C. 121.22, requires that public officials, when meeting to consider official business, conduct those meetings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases