1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 226 A.D.2d
  5. 226 A.D.2d 390 (1996)
 

PEOPLE v. CINTRON

226 A.D.2d 390 (1996)

640 N.Y.S.2d 242

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Cintron, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 1, 1996

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record supports the hearing court's conclusion that the pretrial lineup was not suggestive in any way. While the fillers used in a lineup must be sufficiently similar to the defendant so that no characteristic or visual clue would orient the viewer toward the defendant as a perpetrator of the crimes charged (see, People v Lundquist, 151 A.D.2d 505

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases