MURTHA v. COONS


233 A.D.2d 378 (1996)

650 N.Y.S.2d 580

Kenneth Murtha, Respondent, v. Charles Coons et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 12, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The use of an automobile involves more than just its operation and includes all necessary incidental activities such as entering and exiting (see, Rowell v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 77 N.Y.2d 636, 639; Nassau County Ch. of Assn. for Help of Retarded Children v Insurance Co., 59 A.D.2d 525, 526). Contrary to the defendants' contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases