STATE EX REL. BARCLAYS BANK v. COMMON PLEAS CT.

No. 95-274.

74 Ohio St.3d 536 (1996)

THE STATE EX REL. BARCLAYS BANK PLC ET AL. v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 14, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, John R. Gall, Pamela H. Thurston and Philomena M. Dane, for relator Barclays Bank PLC.

Dinsmore & Shohl and John W. Beatty, for intervening relator Star Bank, N.A.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip L. Zorn, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondents. Cohen, Todd, Kite & Stanford, Donald J. Rafferty and Michael R. Schmidt, for intervenors William A. Thurner, Howard Thiemann, and estate of Arthur Dohme, Verna K. Dohme, executor.

Lindhorst & Dreidame Co., L.P.A., and James M. Moore, for intervenors Thomas Tilsley, Durwood G. Rorie, and V. Snowden Armstrong.


COOK, J.

The critical issue in this case is whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction to issue an injunction to stop payment on a letter of credit when the beneficiary of that letter of credit is not a party to the suit. Because respondents lack such jurisdiction, we find prohibition appropriate, and issue the writ.

Prohibition is an extraordinary writ and we do not grant it routinely or easily:

"`For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases