Whether the "videofluoroscope" or "visualizer" that petitioner seeks to use in his practice is a fluoroscope prohibited to chiropractors by the plain language of Education Law § 6551 (2) (a) is a technical question that should be left to the expertise of the agency responsible for administering the statute, provided its decision is not irrational or unreasonable (see, Matter of New York State Assn. of Life Underwriters v New York State Banking Dept.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF PUGLIESE v. HAMBURG
223 A.D.2d 383 (1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 298
In the Matter of Anthony M. Pugliese, Appellant, v. Margaret A. Hamburg, as Commissioner of Health of The City of New York, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 9, 1996
January 9, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.