1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 116 Ohio
  5. 116 Ohio App.3d 482 (1996)
 

TOLEDO EDISON CO. v. PETITIONERS FOR INCORPORATION OF HOLIDAY CITY

No. WM-95-030.

116 Ohio App.3d 482 (1996)

TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. PETITIONERS FOR INCORPORATION OF VILLAGE OF HOLIDAY CITY et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Williams County.

Decided December 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig J. Van Horsten, Mary Ann Whipple and Lance M. Keiffer, for appellant and cross-appellee.

David W. Zoll and Michelle L. Kranz, for appellee and cross-appellant Incorporators of Holiday City.

Per Curiam.

This case is on appeal from the October 23, 1995 judgment of the Williams County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed the petition for a statutory injunction filed by the Toledo Edison Company, appellant and cross-appellee. On appeal, Toledo Edison asserts the following assignments of error:

"I. The Court of Common Pleas, Williams County, Ohio, erred as a matter of law and applied an incorrect legal definition of resort in holding that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases