MURPHY v. WOOD

No. C8-95-2101.

545 N.W.2d 52 (1996)

Thomas Marcel MURPHY, Appellant, v. Frank WOOD, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford Colbert, St. Paul, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, M. Jacqueline Regis, Alan T. Held, Peter M. Ackerberg, Assistant Attorneys General, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and LANSING and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal challenges the requirement to register as a predatory offender under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 for a conviction "arising out of the same set of circumstances" as a charged sex offense. Because a contested issue exists on whether the conviction arose from the same factual circumstances as the charged predatory offense, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

In April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases