KINSELLA v. KINSELLA


287 N.J. Super. 305 (1996)

671 A.2d 130

JOHN KINSELLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARY KINSELLA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lentz & Gengaro and Toby Solomon, attorneys for appellant (Christopher P. Gengaro, of counsel and on the brief).

Kummer, Knox, Naughton & Hansbury and Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys for respondent (Michael C. Caulfield, on the brief).

Before Judges LONG and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff John Kinsella and defendant Mary Kinsella are currently embroiled in a divorce action. The case has not yet been tried. The trial judge has entered an interlocutory order that "plaintiff and defendant shall each sign authorizations enabling the other party's counsel to obtain all their psychiatric, psychological and other therapists' records" and that "the records may be reviewed by the parties with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases