Based on the documentary evidence submitted to the motion court, it is clear that plaintiff was not prevented from closing on the scheduled "time of the essence" date due to renovations in the building by the ground floor tenant or reluctance of the lender, such conditions not being made part of the contract. Nor did the contract have any financing contingency clause which might have excused plaintiff's failure to perform. We also find that the defendant conclusively established...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
