1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 294 N.J.
  5. 294 N.J. Super. 294 (1996)
 

AVR REALTY CO. v. CRANFORD TP.

294 N.J. Super. 294 (1996)

683 A.2d 235

AVR REALTY CO., C/O ROSE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CRANFORD TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Renaud argued the cause for appellant (Palumbo & Renaud, attorneys; Mr. Renaud, on the brief).

William J. Sitar argued the cause for respondent (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Steven R. Irwin, of counsel and on the brief with Mr. Sitar).

Before Judges PRESSLER, STERN and HUMPHREYS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a Freeze Act case arising under N.J.S.A. 54:51A-8. Defendant municipality, Township of Cranford, appeals from a judgment of the Tax Court granting the motion of the taxpayer, plaintiff AVR Realty Co., for application of the Freeze Act to its 1994 assessment despite the Township's claim of a change in value. We affirm, but for somewhat different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases