GEN. MOTORS CORP v. CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 95-441.

74 Ohio St.3d 513 (1996)

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 14, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones Day, Reavis & Pogue, Roger F. Day and John C. Duffy, Jr., for appellant.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and William J. Day, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Cuyahoga County Auditor and Cuyahoga County Board of Revision.

Armstrong, Mitchell & Damiani, Timothy J. Armstrong, Deborah J. Papushak and William Mitchell, for appellee Parma Board of Education.


Per Curiam.

In R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 198, 201, 527 N.E.2d 874, 877, we stated:

"The BTA need not adopt any expert's valuation. It has wide discretion to determine the weight given to evidence and the credibility of witnesses before it. Its true value decision is a question of fact which will be disturbed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases