GRAY v. WALLMAN & KRAMER


225 A.D.2d 362 (1996)

639 N.Y.S.2d 26

Susan Gray, Respondent, v. Wallman & Kramer, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 12, 1996


We agree with the IAS Court that, under the circumstances, the instant case should be on the trial calendar. Indeed, while defendant Wallman & Kramer has repeatedly attempted to demonstrate that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its discovery requests, the record sufficiently establishes that not only has plaintiff complied with the discovery demands, but many demands are wholly irrelevant to the issues in this action. Moreover, the additional discovery which defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases