The circumstances warrant defendants' examination of appellant through the employee who inspected the apartment in question (CPLR 3101 [a] [4]; 3106 [d]), because the information sought relating to the employee's qualification and training in the operation of the instrument used to test for the presence of lead paint is material and necessary to the defense and cannot be gleaned from appellant's proffered records. Such examination is also appropriate since defendants, who...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
