Even were we prepared to assume in appellant's favor that it is an "interested person" within the meaning of CPLR 5015 (a), on the merits we agree with the IAS Court that appellant has failed to show that the round-the-clock home care being provided for appellant's tenant by the guardian places the tenant
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.