NGUYEN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. C2-95-2305.

546 N.W.2d 37 (1996)

To Van NGUYEN, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 9, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome A. Ritter, Ritter & Fenske, Ltd., St. Paul, for Respondent.

Emilio R. Giuliani, Jr., Martha K. Sieber, LaBore and Giuliani, Ltd., Hopkins, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., and HUSPENI and PETERSON, JJ.


OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant insurer challenges the district court denial of its motion to vacate a judgment, which was entered after appellant failed to appeal from mandatory, nonbinding arbitration by filing a timely request for trial de novo. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 13, 1991, respondent To Van Nguyen was involved in an automobile accident. Nguyen brought suit against his automobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases