1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 290 N.J.
  5. 290 N.J. Super. 293 (1996)
 

KASELAAN & D'ANGELO v. SOFFIAN

290 N.J. Super. 293 (1996)

675 A.2d 705

KASELAAN & D'ANGELO ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WARREN L. SOFFIAN, ESQ.; SOFFIAN & ALLEN; AND MASTER, DONSKY, SOFFIAN & ALLEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon C. Martin argued the cause for appellants (Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, attorneys; Mr. Martin and Richard E. Wegryn, on the brief).

Janice L. Richter, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges SKILLMAN, PAUL G. LEVY and EICHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the entire controversy doctrine requires the dismissal of a state court action arising out of the same sequence of events as a previously filed federal district court action, even though the federal action has not yet been concluded.

On June 9, 1992, plaintiff, Kaselaan & D'Angelo Associates, Inc. (K & D), together with its parent corporation, Hill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases