MAHL v. CITIBANK


234 A.D.2d 348 (1996)

651 N.Y.S.2d 543

Joel D. Mahl et al., Appellants, v. Citibank, N. A., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 9, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Citibank, N. A. (hereinafter Citibank), brought a foreclosure action against the appellants in which the appellants failed to interpose an answer and ultimately defaulted. The appellants then brought this action against Citibank, an officer of Citibank, and Citibank's attorney, to recover damages alleging, inter alia, that Citibank had (1) brought the foreclosure action with the willful intent to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases