Summary judgment was properly denied, there being questions of fact whether appellants' nonprofessional employees failed to gather all necessary information relating to plaintiff's MRI test, whether they acted outside the scope of their employment and training by determining what type of MRI scan to perform without prior consultation with the supervising radiologist and whether they provided the interpreting radiologist with all of the information...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
