The motion court properly found the challenged administrative determination to be nonreviewable at this time since the agency has not yet determined petitioner's pending petition for administrative review. In these circumstances, neither review nor relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 is available (Matter of Wyndham Realty Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DIBBS v. MULHOLLAND
232 A.D.2d 346 (1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 921
In the Matter of Stephen Dibbs, Appellant, v. John Mulholland et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 31, 1996
October 31, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
