It is well established that the very limited standard which governs judicial review by mandamus of an administrative determination pursuant to CPLR article 78 is whether the determination was arbitrary and capricious, and that a reviewing court is therefore restricted to an assessment of whether the action in question was taken "without sound basis in reason and * * * without regard to the facts" (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF KENTON ASSOCS., LTD. v. DIV. OF HOUS. & CMTY. RENEWAL
225 A.D.2d 349 (1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 16
In the Matter of Kenton Associates, Ltd., Appellant, v. Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 12, 1996
March 12, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
