1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 295 N.J.
  5. 295 N.J. Super. 271 (1996)
 

OHIO CAS. v. MEADOWLANDS TOYOTA

295 N.J. Super. 271 (1996)

685 A.2d 7

OHIO CASUALTY A/S/O DIGIACINTO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MEADOWLANDS TOYOTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ciarrocca and Ciarrocca, attorneys for appellant (Mark P. Ciarrocca, on the brief).

Breslin & Trovini, attorneys for respondent (David S. Lafferty, on the brief).

Before Judges KING and CONLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This is a subrogation action by Ohio Casualty for property damage consequent upon a bailment of Barry C. DiGiacinto's automobile to a dealer for repairs. This case implicates the entire controversy doctrine, particularly as a result of Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 678 A.2d 243 (1996), decided on July 10, 1996, in the wake of the quartet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases