1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 224 A.D.2d
  5. 224 A.D.2d 340 (1996)
 

BRANNIGAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

224 A.D.2d 340 (1996)

638 N.Y.S.2d 59

Thomas P. Brannigan et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 27, 1996

It is well-settled law that the purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof, and to prevent surprise at trial (Laukaitis v Ski Stop, 202 A.D.2d 554, 555; State of New York v Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Assn., 34 A.D.2d 769, 770).

In the matter at bar, the specific material requested by the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases