Defendant's claim concerning the hearing court's refusal to direct the People to produce the pouch seized from defendant at the time of the arrest is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the ruling was a proper exercise of discretion. The testimony of the arresting officer, which described the pouch in detail, including the length of its zipper and the degree to which it was open, was adequate to permit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
