1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 96 F.3d
  5. 96 F.3d 453 (1996)
 

U.S. v. HANNA

No. 95-10555.

96 F.3d 453 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cyril T. HANNA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V. Roy Lefcourt and Shana Keating, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellant.

Martha Boersch, Assistant United States Attorney, Oakland, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: SNEED, SCHROEDER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

I

On May 31, 1995, we vacated appellant Hanna's criminal conviction and remanded his case to the district court for an evidentiary hearing and a determination of whether the government had fulfilled its responsibility under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), to produce possible impeaching evidence as to its main witness, Sgt. Crenshaw. U.S. v. Hanna,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases