1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 228 A.D.2d
  5. 228 A.D.2d 321 (1996)
 

MASSACHUSETTS BAY INS. CO. v. STAMM

228 A.D.2d 321 (1996)

644 N.Y.S.2d 230

Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Thoburn M. Stamm, Jr., as Conservator for Marilyn M. Stamm, Conservatee, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Hanover Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 20, 1996

The motion court correctly concluded that the 29 documents requested by defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant are immune from discovery because they are covered by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work product privilege, or they are documents produced for or in anticipation of litigation, or they are irrelevant to the instant declaratory judgment action.

Appellant's claim that two of the documents arise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases