U.S. v. PALOMINO

No. 93-6364.

100 F.3d 446 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo PALOMINO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart J. Canale (briefed), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Leslie I. Ballin (briefed), Ballin & Ballin, Memphis, TN, Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RYAN, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Ricardo Palomino, appeals his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence. Palomino further argues that the evidence introduced by the prosecution was insufficient to support a finding of guilt. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. Facts

Mark Kellerhall, a patrolman with the Shelby County Sheriff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases