1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 295 N.J.
  5. 295 N.J. Super. 244 (1996)
 

BLACK v. WALKER

295 N.J. Super. 244 (1996)

684 A.2d 1011

ROSE BLACK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH WALKER AND JOAN WALKER, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH WALKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven A. Caputo and Jessell Rothman of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Rothman, on the brief).

Mezey & Mezey, attorneys for respondent (Frederick C. Mezey, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, KEEFE and LOFTUS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

The trial judge applied New Jersey law in deciding that a New York father had a duty to pay college education support for his child who lived her entire life in New Jersey with her mother. On this appeal the estate of Joseph Walker, through his executrix, Joan Walker, raises seven claims of error to the orders entered in the Family Part relating to the duty of educational support to Hazel Craig, his daughter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases