1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 473 S.E.2d
  5. 473 S.E.2d 64 (1996)
 

MOORE v. SIMPSON

No. 2546.

473 S.E.2d 64 (1996)

Mary Joe MOORE and Charlotte Ann Smith, Appellants, v. David E. SIMPSON, individually, and Kimball, Dove & Simpson, a partnership, including professional association, and Bayles B. Mack, individually, and Barron Mack, a partnership, including professional association, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided July 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis T. Draine, of Columbia, for appellants.

S. Jackson Kimball, of Rock Hill, for respondents.

HUFF, Judge:

Appellants, Mary Joe Moore and Charlotte Ann Smith, appeal an order of the trial judge quashing service of their summons and complaint based on insufficiency of service of process. We affirm.

FACTS

In February 1994, counsel for appellants notified respondent David E. Simpson of Kimball, Dove & Simpson that an investigation was under way to determine the validity of a claim by the appellants against Simpson for legal malpractice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases