1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 186 Ariz.
  5. 186 Ariz. 351 (1996)
 

CRUM v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. 1 CA-SA 96-0101.

186 Ariz. 351 (1996)

922 P.2d 316

Paul J. CRUM and Sharon Crum, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable William T. Moroney, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, Lawrence M. CUTLER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

August 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Lazarus, P.C. by Paul F. Lazarus and Therese K. Desai, Phoenix, for Petitioners.

Brown & Bain by Daniel C. Barr and John J. Tuchi, Phoenix, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The underlying action in this case is one for defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Defendant, a Deputy Maricopa County Attorney, claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to dismiss because the Plaintiff, before bringing the action, did not file a notice of claim pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated ("A.R.S.") section 12-821.01...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases