BOGARD v. PAUL


228 A.D.2d 306 (1996)

643 N.Y.S.2d 999

Ronald Bogard, Appellant, v. Rodman W. Paul, Jr., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 18, 1996


Under the broad arbitration clause prepared by plaintiff as attorney for all parties herein, the causes of action were properly directed to arbitration by the motion court. There are no public policy considerations involved in this purely personal dispute which would impel a court not to honor the parties' agreement providing for arbitration (see, Matter of Wertlieb [Greystone Partnerships Group], 165 A.D.2d 644).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases