Defendant's claim that the hearing court should have inspected documents, identified by a police witness as routinely prepared in the course of an arrest and an arrestee's interview, to determine whether or not they were Rosario material, and that the case should be remanded to the hearing court for such a determination, is unpreserved as a matter of law, since defendant's attorney requested only a personal inspection of the documents and not an in camera inspection...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
