1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 46 Cal.App.4th
  5. 46 Cal.App.4th 476 (1996)
 

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DIST. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A072986.

46 Cal.App.4th 476 (1996)

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Respondent; CAROLYN ETIER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

June 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Ralph W. Robinson and Ronald F. Berestka, Jr., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Perry S. Dobson for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

Bay Area Rapid Transit District (hereafter BART) seeks a writ to require respondent court to grant its motion for summary judgment. As explained below, we agree that BART is entitled to summary judgment and grant the requested relief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Carolyn Etier (hereafter plaintiff) filed a complaint against BART alleging that on February 18, 1993, plaintiff boarded a BART train...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases