Substantial evidence supports respondent's finding that petitioner sold beer to an underage police cadet without asking for identification in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1). Conflicts in the record concerning the identity of the cashier who took the cadet's money, and the testimony of petitioner's witnesses that petitioner does not sell beer to younger-looking customers without checking proof of age, raised issues of credibility that are for respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
