TUNG v. BRIANT PARK HOMES, INC.


287 N.J. Super. 232 (1996)

670 A.2d 1092

DA-LU TUNG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BRIANT PARK HOMES, INC., DEFENDANT. RALPH J. POCARO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. HUGO M. PFALTZ AND PFALTZ & WOLLER, P.A., THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond K. Hsu, attorney for appellant.

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin & Davis, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant Pocaro (Dennis A. Estis, of counsel and on the brief; Stephanie Kay Austin, on the brief).

Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, attorneys for cross-respondents/cross-appellants Hugo M. Pfaltz & Woller, P.A. (Christopher J. Carey, of counsel and on the reply brief; Angelo R. Giacchi, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WEFING and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by RODRIGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D.

In this case we consider whether a developer who fails to deliver a current public offering statement (POS) on the contract date, as required by the New Jersey Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-21 to -56 (the Act), is liable to the purchaser for double damages and costs if there is no causal connection between such failure and the losses sustained by the purchaser...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases