There was sufficient evidence to support the determination of the Board of Trustees that petitioner was not physically disabled from performing his duties, since repeated examinations indicated that his cervical range of motion was within normal limits and that there was no evidence of shoulder or arm atrophy. As for the psychological aspect of petitioner's retirement application, respondents were entitled to find that there was insufficient evidence to establish the existence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
